Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 994 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 180 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |