Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$369.9 vs CA$2196.32
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.82 vs CA$7.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 40% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 284 vs 203 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
284
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.73/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$2196.32
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,196.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |