Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$615.63 vs CA$728.98
- Up to 6% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$2.76 vs CA$2.95 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 247 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
223
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$615.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$615.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
247
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.95/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$728.98
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$728.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |