Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 938 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$259.45 vs CA$314.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing New World than Core i7-8700K - CA$2.22 vs CA$2.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Core i3-10320 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.64/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$314
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |