Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700K is 35 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 191 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$216.88 vs CA$303.46
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$1.14 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$216.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$216.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
67%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
71%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |