Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 351 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$44.99 vs CA$151.99
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$151.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74765 minutes ago
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
41.425689307330195%
Multi-Core
1051
22.80321110870037%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |