Buy on Amazon
CA$113.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2024 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 135 vs 126 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$113.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Dual-core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
