Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1336 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-8320 - 297 vs 291 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |