Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1404 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 186 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |