Buy on Amazon
CA$153.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 668 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X CPU Used 6-Core 12-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 16M 95W Socket AM4
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Ryzen 5 2600X
Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing
1 FPS
CA$2799/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Ryzen 5 2600X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,799
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
