Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-875K is 918 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610 - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
