Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3595 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron B815 - 324 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 24 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
324
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$405.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$405.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |