Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3922 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron B815 - 205 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 24 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |