Buy on Amazon
CA$278.98
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4031 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 42% better in Lost Ark than Celeron B815 - 305 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
305
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$278.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
PC Builds Using Celeron B815 or Ryzen 5 7600
Lost Ark, 1920 x 1080, Very High
198 FPS
CA$9.09/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Ryzen 5 7600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,799.99
In Stock
210 FPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
Ryzen 5 7600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$N/A
Out of Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
