Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3231 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Apex Legends than Celeron B815 - 300 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
300
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$489.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$489.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |