Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3762 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron B815 - 215 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$176.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$176.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |