Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 3231 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron B815 - 217 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |