Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3746 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than Celeron B815 - 284 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |