Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 75 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 221 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
219
99.09502262443439%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Buy for CA$300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
95.34606205250597%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |