Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 75 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 427 vs 424 FPS
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
424
99.29742388758783%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Buy for CA$258.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
96.38118214716526%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |