Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 245 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 121 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
110
90.9090909090909%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$287.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$287.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1598
73.10155535224153%
Multi-Core
14828
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |