Buy on Amazon
CA$196.3
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i7-4785T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2599 days newer than Core i7-4785T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 3% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i7-4785T - 206 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4785T - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-4785T CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 2.2 GHz 8M 35W LGA1150
Buy for CA$196.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
951
59.511889862327905%
Multi-Core
3076
20.744537361748044%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i7-4785T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
