Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-9400F - 245 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 128 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - CA$179.34 vs CA$7560.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
245
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$7560
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$7,560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76923 minutes ago
Buy for CA$179.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
86.23279098873591%
Multi-Core
4834
32.600485567844615%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |