Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 184 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$114.99 vs CA$552.98
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
99.45652173913044%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$552.98
20%
Buy for CA$552.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Buy for CA$114.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |