Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 663 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$425.0 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$2.76 vs CA$4.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
150
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.84/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
58%
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$425
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |