Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 663 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 247 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$611.76 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
97.16599190283401%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
53%
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74731 minutes ago
Buy for CA$611.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74731 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
73.2183908045977%
Multi-Core
7454
81.948109058927%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |