Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 418 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$726.1 vs CA$1580.77
- Up to 54% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$3.82 vs CA$8.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 180 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 48 vs 24 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.28/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Colfax | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |