Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$157.24 vs CA$395.34
- Up to 57% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-11900 - CA$1.19 vs CA$2.76 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-10400F - 143 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.76/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$395.34
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$395.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |