Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - CA$129.99 vs CA$549.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-12900 - CA$1.11 vs CA$3.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 45% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10400F - 170 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
68.82352941176471%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.24/FPS
34.25925925925926%
Price, CA$
CA$549.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
58.14799838253134%
Multi-Core
5751
44.089236430542776%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |