Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$157.24 vs CA$758.34
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$2.67 vs CA$12.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400F - 63 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13361 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.04/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$758.34
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$758.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |