Buy on Amazon
CA$194.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 185 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$84.01 vs CA$194.24
- Up to 47% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.56 vs CA$1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.05/FPS
53.333333333333336%
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
43%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor (YD190XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
81.62162162162161%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
