Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4112 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$80.8 vs CA$269.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$0.35 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 29% better in Ready or Not than FX-6100 - 299 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
231
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4154 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
299
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$269
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |