Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$98.43 vs CA$369.99
- Up to 59% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.94 vs CA$2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 52% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-6100 - 160 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
105
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |