Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$98.43 vs CA$349.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-14400 - CA$1.7 vs CA$3.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 69% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6100 - 98 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
58
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
98
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.57/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$349.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |