Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$83.57 vs CA$194.24
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 185 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |