Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$133.92 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.65 vs CA$1.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 3 3200G - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$388
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |