Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Phenom X4 9650 vs FX-6100

Phenom X4 9650 vs FX-6100: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — FX-6100 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 1294 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.

Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650

  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-6100

  • Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 222 vs 219 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 6 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Tom Clancy’s The Division 2.
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

Tom Clancy’s The Division 2

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Phenom X4 9650 Logo
Phenom X4 9650

Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008


FPS

219

98%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


FPS

222

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$0.45/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$99.02

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX

Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 82 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Phenom X4 9650 Logo
Phenom X4 9650

Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Phenom X4 9650 Logo
Phenom X4 9650

Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008


Single-Core

238

62%

Multi-Core

765

62%

AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


Single-Core

381

100%

Multi-Core

1224

100%

AMD Phenom X4 9650 Logo

AMD Phenom X4 9650

vs
AMD FX-6100 Logo

AMD FX-6100

Mar 27th, 2008Release Date
Oct 12th, 2011
Phenom X4CollectionFX
AgenaCodenameZambezi
AMD Socket AM2+SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
6
4Threads
6
2.3 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.3 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed3.6 GHz
95 WTDP95 W
65 nmProcess Size
32 nm
11.5xMultiplier
16.5x
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.