Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 4044 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 445% better in League of Legends than Phenom X4 9650 - 158 vs 29 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
17.321688500727802%
Multi-Core
765
20.850367947669664%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |