Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1757 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-9590 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$44.99 vs CA$340.0
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75508 minutes ago
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |