Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1500X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1500X is 2008 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1500X - CA$87.12 vs CA$180.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1500X - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.21 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
144
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$180
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |