Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - CA$87.12 vs CA$126.88
- Up to 22% better value when playing New World than Core i3-8100 - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than FX-8150 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
98
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18203 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$126.88
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$126.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |