Buy on Amazon
CA$63.38
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - CA$33.99 vs CA$63.38
- Up to 43% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-8100 - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
56.75675675675676%
Price, CA$
CA$63.38
53%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-8100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores Up to 3.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for CA$63.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48118 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
92.44186046511628%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$33.99
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.666666666666664%
Multi-Core
992
29.133627019089577%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
