Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 5300G - CA$87.12 vs CA$177.32
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 5300G - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.29 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8150 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
115
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18045 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$177.32
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$177.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |