Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - CA$87.12 vs CA$149.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-12100 - CA$0.81 vs CA$1.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 36% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8150 - 145 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
107
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$149
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |