Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - CA$87.12 vs CA$140.95
- Up to 30% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-10100 - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-8150 - 102 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13688 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
102
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$140.95
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$140.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |