Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$87.12 vs CA$153.88
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 193% better in League of Legends than FX-8150 - 161 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 39% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-8150 - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18447 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
56%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18447 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |