Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$98.43 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 52% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.9 vs CA$1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 26% better in HITMAN 2 than FX-6100 - 137 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
109
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.89/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |