Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8150 - 139 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$87.12 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
122
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |