Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6900K - 219 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$99.95 vs CA$248.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.46 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |