Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 300 vs 287 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $93.99 vs $232.12
- Up to 62% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.31 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |