Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Xeon E5-1620 v4

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for $232.12 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 80 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

4.2 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $744.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 79 minutes ago

Xeon E5-1620 v4

3.5 GHz | 4-core

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for $232.12 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 80 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

4.2 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $744.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 79 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2389 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.

Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4

  • Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $232.12 vs $744.99
  • Up to 65% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.91 vs $2.62 per FPS

Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D

  • Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 284 vs 254 FPS
  • Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Calculator background
This is a free version of Monster Hunter: World.
Monster Hunter: World

Monster Hunter: World

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


FPS

254

89%

Value, $/FPS

$0.91/FPS

100%

Price, $

$232.12

100%

Value Winner

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Quad-core [4 Core] 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3

Buy for $232.12 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 80 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

284

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.62/FPS

35%

Price, $

$744.99

31%

FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $744.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 79 minutes ago

Trending Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Highest

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo
Xeon E5-1620 v4

Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016


Single-Core

1088

37%

Multi-Core

3898

20%

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2918

100%

Multi-Core

19633

100%

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 Logo

Xeon E5-1620 v4

vs
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Logo

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Jun 20th, 2016Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5CollectionRyzen 9
Broadwell-E/EPCodenameRaphael
Intel Socket 2011-3SocketAMD Socket AM5
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
16
8Threads
32
3.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.7 GHz
140 WTDP
120 W
14 nmProcess Size
5 nm
35.0xMultiplier
42.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
NoOverclockable
Yes

PCs Using Xeon E5-1620 v4 or Ryzen 9 7950X3D

With selected game settings

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.